.svg)
Last year, my predictions centred on three themes: AI would become explainable, economic pressure would accelerate RegTech adoption, and regulatory divergence would reshape compliance strategy. All three materialised faster than expected.
2025 became the year AI in compliance crossed the threshold from promise to practice. Supervisors demanded explainability, institutions moved beyond pilots, and the economics of illicit finance forced every boardroom to confront whether their compliance investment was delivering real impact. The Napier AI / AML Index 2025–2026 reflects this shift, showing a global pivot toward measurable, responsible AI adoption.
Now, looking ahead, those same forces are about to intensify. Here are the five trends that will define financial crime compliance in 2026 – and how they build on what we saw last year.
1. Agentic AI brings a new era of explainability
As outlined in this year’s Index, regulators have moved decisively. The EU AI Act has embedded explainability into law, Saudi Arabia and Hong Kong have introduced new AI governance principles, Singapore has launched national AI programmes with clear expectations for oversight, and supervisors across Europe, Asia and the Americas are now setting explicit expectations for transparency and auditability. Countries once hesitant are embedding AI directly into compliance agendas.
Agentic AI, the newest wave of AI hype, will place even greater pressure on institutions to demonstrate that AI is not acting autonomously in ways that cannot be explained or audited. Most systems marketed as ‘agents’ today are, in reality, workflow automations rather than truly adaptive, goal-driven intelligence.
In 2026, the priority should be explainability and guardrails over autonomy. Agentic capabilities will need to prove that recommendations, actions, and decisions remain transparent, traceable, and human-supervised.
2. Technology resilience will become the new measure of AML maturity
Last year, we predicted that institutions would shift from box-ticking compliance to value-driven AI adoption. That shift has begun, but in 2026, the differentiator will be the ability to deliver continuous, real-time, explainable compliance even under pressure.
Core operations such as digital banking, instant payments, and customer onboarding are now API-driven, interconnected across real-time platforms, and executed in milliseconds. CIOs are prioritising infrastructure performance and platform consolidation, moving away from siloed, product-line technologies toward integrated banking, payments, and credit hubs that bring fraud and financial crime intelligence into a single decisioning layer.
AML teams are often left behind. Fragmented rules, legacy systems, and heightened transparency requirements mean compliance technology struggles to match the pace of the real-time environment shaping the rest of the organisation.
In 2026, financial institutions will look to cloud-native, high-availability infrastructure and sub-100ms API performance, ensuring screening and monitoring never become bottlenecks.
3. Regulatory divergence will deepen, and multi-configuration compliance will become essential
Regulatory expectations are moving in different directions globally, and this divergence will define the AML landscape in 2026. The EU continues down a prescriptive path with the AI Act and accelerated AMLA preparation, embedding explainability and model governance into law. Meanwhile, the US is pursuing a mixed deregulation agenda, easing certain reporting requirements even as it tightens sanctions and real-estate transparency. In the Middle East, markets such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia are adopting business-first AI strategies as part of national transformation programmes, while Singapore, Canada and Australia advance principles-based frameworks designed to encourage innovation while raising expectations.
For global compliance leaders, this fragmentation introduces operational complexity. Institutions must demonstrate consistent global standards while adapting controls to the legal, cultural and risk realities of each jurisdiction.
As regulatory divergence deepens, screening frameworks must adapt to different jurisdictions, risk appetites, and sector-specific rules. Yet many organisations still operate noisy, overly broad configurations where everyone is screened against everything, unchanged data is repeatedly rescreened, and alert volumes remain disconnected from real risk. In this environment, adding AI to a misaligned system only amplifies complexity. The priority in 2026 must be ensuring the screening engine is precise, jurisdiction-aware, and multi-configurable before introducing more advanced AI-driven capabilities.
4. Financial crime will move earlier in the lifecycle – and so will compliance
Financial crime is evolving faster than traditional controls can keep up. Instant payments, 24/7 settlement, emerging digital assets, and AI-generated synthetic identities are reshaping the risk surface. Criminals are exploiting this new infrastructure with increasing sophistication.
In 2026, institutions will need to shift decisively upstream in the lifecycle. Rather than waiting for suspicious behaviours to surface during monitoring, financial institutions will integrate intelligence into onboarding flows and customer journeys. This means aligning controls with the earliest possible signals of risk – structuring data more effectively, linking behaviours across channels, and embedding risk insights into the decisioning layer that powers real-time payments and digital onboarding.
The institutions that move risk assessment upstream will outperform those relying on downstream alerting. Early detection will become a defining advantage, enabling firms to break the cycle of crisis-driven monitoring and move toward proactive, intelligence-led financial crime prevention.
Looking back – and looking ahead
Looking back, the predictions we made for 2025 proved accurate, but the pace of change exceeded expectations. AI became explainable by necessity, not choice. Economic pressure pushed institutions to justify every investment. Regulatory divergence accelerated. And across every region, supervisors signalled that opaque, ungoverned AI systems would no longer be tolerated.
The Napier AI / AML Index 2025–2026 captures this shift clearly. AI moved from experimentation to expectation, compliance leaders began prioritising measurable impact over novelty, and financial institutions recognised that resilience, precision, and transparency are now the foundations of effective financial crime control.
.jpg)
